Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1529154
| From | Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings |
| Date | 2016-11-24 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sGZLk-1wb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sGUsh-6pb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGUsi-6pb-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGZLk-1wb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGZrY-1oP-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Samsung Electronics |
On 2016년 11월 24일 19:20, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:01 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch just fixes the checkpatch warnings.
>
> unrelated trivia:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> []
>> @@ -538,15 +538,14 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>> devfreq = find_device_devfreq(dev);
>> mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>> if (!IS_ERR(devfreq)) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "%s: Unable to create devfreq for the device. It already has one.\n", __func__);
>> + dev_err(dev, "%s: Unable to create devfreq for the device.\n",
>> + __func__);
>> err = -EINVAL;
>> goto err_out;
>> }
>
> It seems to be simpler if find_device_devfreq just returned NULL
> in the error cases as the only test is IS_ERR and not a
> specific error return type. Then these IS_ERR calls could be
> a NULL pointer test instead.
>
>> @@ -576,11 +575,13 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>> goto err_out;
>> }
>>
>> - devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, sizeof(unsigned int) *
>> + devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
>> + sizeof(unsigned int) *
>> devfreq->profile->max_state *
>> devfreq->profile->max_state,
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> - devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, sizeof(unsigned long) *
>> + devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
>> + sizeof(unsigned long) *
>> devfreq->profile->max_state,
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Maybe these should be devm_kcalloc calls
Why should devfreq use the devm_kcalloc?
>
>> devfreq->last_stat_updated = jiffies;
>> @@ -990,7 +991,7 @@ static ssize_t cur_freq_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>
>> if (devfreq->profile->get_cur_freq &&
>> !devfreq->profile->get_cur_freq(devfreq->dev.parent, &freq))
>> - return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", freq);
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", freq);
>
> Be nicer to align the second line in the if test here too
>
> if (devfreq->profile->get_cur_freq &&
> !devfreq->profile->get_cur_freq(devfreq->dev.parent, &freq))
> return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", freq);
>
>> return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", devfreq->previous_freq);
>> }
>
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/6] PM / devfreq: Modify devfreq/devfreq-event for improvement Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> - 2016-11-24 06:10 +0100
[PATCH 6/6] PM / devfreq: event: exynos-ppmu: Add the completion log of device registration Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> - 2016-11-24 06:10 +0100
[PATCH 2/6] PM / devfreq: Modify the device name as devfreq[X] for sysfs Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> - 2016-11-24 06:10 +0100
[PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> - 2016-11-24 06:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-11-24 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> - 2016-11-24 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-11-24 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> - 2016-11-25 00:40 +0100
csiph-web