Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1529105
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL |
| Date | 2016-11-24 10:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sGYFA-Ou-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sGkf7-8lc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGYFA-Ou-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 1:30:03 AM CET Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > The newly added check for RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA in kmemleak breaks ARM whenever
> > XIP_KERNEL is enabled:
> >
> > mm/kmemleak.o: In function `kmemleak_scan':
> > kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e4): undefined reference to `__end_data_ro_after_init'
> > kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e8): undefined reference to `__start_data_ro_after_init'
> >
> > This adds the start/end symbols for the section even in the case of having
> > no data in the section, to make the check work while keeping the architecture
> > specific override in one place.
> >
> > Fixes: d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > The patch causing this was merged late into v4.9-rc, this one should
> > probably go there as well.
> >
> > I assume the same problem exists on s390, but I have not checked that.
>
> Hi Arnd!
>
> Sorry for breaking things again :( The confusion must have been caused
> by going via different trees. Actually, Russell's commit is dated 6
> days after mine so could as well be:
>
> Fixes: 2a3811068fbc ("ARM: Fix XIP kernels")
>
> Not that it matters.
Got it. I guess it's really the combination of the two, so I'd clarify
that in the changelog and list both commits.
> About s390 - I thought I took care of it in d7c19b066dcf ("mm:
> kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init"), do you see anything suspicious
> in the way I did it? I'll do some more s390 builds just to triple
> check.
You are right, I had already noticed that too but not replied yet.
s390 is ok as far as I can tell.
Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-11-22 15:30 +0100 Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-11-22 22:20 +0100 Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-11-24 10:40 +0100 Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2016-11-24 10:40 +0100
csiph-web