Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1528978
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linker-tables v5 testing |
| Date | 2016-11-24 06:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sGUiB-65P-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sGTFT-5T2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/23/2016 08:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Guenter, > > I think I'm ready to start pushing a new patch set out for review. > Before I do that -- can I trouble you for letting your test > infrastructure hammer it? I'll only push out the patches for review Pushed into my testing branch > based on this new set of changes once all tests come back OK for all > architectures. > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux-next.git/log/?h=20161117-linker-tables-v5 > > Fenguang & Guenter, > > Any chance I can trouble you to enable the new driver: > CONFIG_TEST_LINKTABLES=y on each kernel configuration as it will run a > test driver which will WARN_ON() if it finds any errors. > I added this to all defconfigs in the testing branch. That doesn't test all configurations, but at least those which use a standard defconfig as base, which by now is most of them. Guenter > If these warns are captured by your logs then we will see run time use > issues of using this on any architecture for *all* the sections for > linker tables. I had not bothered yet adding a test driver for section > ranges given I already tested > ./tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest script and confirm things > are still a go. > > To the rest on Cc: > > Other than a few documentation improvements I think this is now > done... Of course there may be more bike-shedding or few minor > adjustments I may have missed -- Nickolas (or others), please do poke > me with any last minute blockers you see before I push out a new patch > set. I figure there may be some time before the tests are over and I > could probably adjust the series to account for minor things that are > eye-sores before requiring a full new submission. > > Also I have a draft edit of a paper on this (hasn't been adjusted to > account for the new API changes yet), if you're in the US and you want > to be anti-social and read something during turkey day perhaps that > might help. > > http://drvbp1.linux-foundation.org/~mcgrof/papers/2016/11/21/linker-tables-20161121.pdf > > Oh and tools folks: > > cd tools/linker-tables/ > make clean > make > ./demo > > Luis >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linker-tables v5 testing "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-11-24 05:20 +0100 Re: linker-tables v5 testing Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-11-24 06:00 +0100 Re: linker-tables v5 testing Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-11-24 17:20 +0100
csiph-web