Re: module: When modifying a module's text ignore modules which are going away too

From	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: module: When modifying a module's text ignore modules which are going away too
Date	2016-11-23 17:10 +0100
Message-ID	<sGIhs-71P-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<swvbP-3py-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <swTnP-2Bn-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <swTnP-2Bn-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAQB4-2vw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sByC5-69v-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 05:40:58 -0500
Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> wrote:

> +++ Aaron Tomlin [07/11/16 11:46 +0000]:
> >Hi Jessica,
> >
> >Any thoughts?  
> 
> Hi Aaron,
> 
> Thanks for your patience as I slowly work through a large swath of emails :-)
> 
> Anyway, this looks fine to me. A going module's text should be (or
> soon will be) rw anyway, so checking for going modules in the ro
> case should be enough.
> 
> Rusty, if you give your ack for the second patch, I can apply both
> patches to my modules-next branch. I'll also incorporate Steven's
> suggestion for a comment explaining why going modules shouldn't be
> converted to ro in this context.
> 

Hi Jessica,

Have you pulled these in? I haven't noticed them in linux-next.

-- Steve

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: module: When modifying a module's text ignore modules which are  going away too Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-11-23 17:10 +0100
  Re: module: When modifying a module's text ignore modules which are  going away too Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-11-23 19:40 +0100

csiph-web