Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1526314
| From | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 |
| Date | 2016-11-20 23:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sFIWd-182-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sFItb-Vd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 14:05 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > That said, nothing particular is bothering me all that much, but we've > had some of the VMALLOC_STACK fixups continue to trickle in, so I > worry that we're not quite done there yet. And let's see what > Thorsten's regression list looks like next week. So no decision yet, > it could still go either way. Hosts with ~100,000 threads have an issue with /prov/vmallocinfo It can take about 800 usec to skip over ~100,000 struct vmap_area in s_start(), while holding vmap_area_lock spinlock, and therefore blocking fork()/pthread_create(). I presume we can not switch to the rbtree (vmap_area_root) for /proc/vmallocinfo, because this file is seek-able, right ?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux 4.9-rc6 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-20 23:10 +0100
Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 23:40 +0100
Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-21 00:30 +0100
Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-11-21 02:40 +0100
Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:00 +0100
Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-11-21 09:40 +0100
Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:40 +0100
Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 15:00 +0100
Re: Linux 4.9-rc6 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 17:50 +0100
csiph-web