Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1523772

[PATCH v2] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates

Show all headers | View raw

The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.

Both increase and decrease happen at steps.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
---
 -> v2
Remove a trailing space

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
  * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
  * (default), then we try to decrease frequency
  *
- * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
- * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
+ * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
+ * frequency
  */
 static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
-- 
2.7.4

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v2] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency  updates Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> - 2016-11-16 20:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining  frequency updates Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-17 04:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-11-24 02:10 +0100

csiph-web