Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1525393
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation |
| Date | 2016-11-18 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sESkX-8jW-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <svO6S-ak-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <svO6S-ak-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sw63L-3ER-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sw6dr-3Ia-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <swaqJ-6ln-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:58:11AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I agree with Daniel, especially since I don't usually trust the
> compiler. And the added variable is more of a distraction as it doesn't
> seem to have any real purpose.
I don't think there's anything here to trust the compiler on. Either
it inlines or it doesn't, it should generate 'correct' code either way.
If it doesn't inline, its a dumb compiler and it will make these dumb
decisions throughout the tree and your kernel will be slow, not my
problem really ;-)
That said, I agree that the single line thing is actually easier to
read.
That said; there's something to be said for:
u64 running_bw;
static void add_running_bw(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
{
u64 old = dl_rq->running_bw;
dl_rq->running_bw += dl_se->dl_bw;
SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw < old); /* overflow */
}
static void sub_running_bw(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
{
u64 old = dl_rq->running_bw;
dl_rq->running_bw -= dl_se->dl_bw;
SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > old); /* underflow */
}
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-18 15:30 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-11-18 16:20 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-18 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-11-18 17:50 +0100
csiph-web