Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1525351
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group |
| Date | 2016-11-18 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sES1z-8aS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sEF4l-7Yr-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEPwK-6s7-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEQCu-75C-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEQVQ-7dC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sERId-7NQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:48:59PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:53:54PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> > index efca2685d876..7b1b34576886 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> > @@ -319,9 +319,9 @@ static struct intel_uncore_box *uncore_alloc_box(struct intel_uncore_type *type,
> > */
> > static int uncore_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event);
> >
> > -static bool is_uncore_event(struct perf_event *event)
> > +static bool is_box_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *event)
> > {
> > - return event->pmu->event_init == uncore_pmu_event_init;
> > + return box->pmu == event->pmu;
>
> this one needs to be:
>
> + return box->pmu == uncore_event_to_pmu(event);
>
> and it works.. ;-)
Will that not explode if we fudge a software event in there?
Wouldn't:
return box->pmu.pmu == event->pmu;
be the safer option?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-11-18 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-18 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-11-18 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-18 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-11-18 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-11-18 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-18 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-11-18 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: Allow single pmu/box within events group Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-18 15:50 +0100
[tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Allow only a single PMU/box within an events group tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-11-22 13:40 +0100
csiph-web