Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1523447

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API

From Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API
Date 2016-11-16 14:00 +0100
Message-ID <sE7YJ-2Un-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <spiMp-20b-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDmZQ-5PY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDGca-1OE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDHhU-2vk-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sE7vI-2KY-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 15 November 2016 at 09:27, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, David Weinehall <tao@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44:25PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 06 Oct 2016, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
>>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>>> > index 23a6c7213eca..7412a05fa5d9 100644
>>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>>> > @@ -14636,6 +14636,7 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs intel_crtc_funcs = {
>>>> >    .page_flip = intel_crtc_page_flip,
>>>> >    .atomic_duplicate_state = intel_crtc_duplicate_state,
>>>> >    .atomic_destroy_state = intel_crtc_destroy_state,
>>>> > +  .set_crc_source = intel_crtc_set_crc_source,
>>>> >  };
>>>> >
>>>> >  /**
>>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>>>> > index 737261b09110..31894b7c6517 100644
>>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>>>> > @@ -1844,6 +1844,14 @@ void intel_color_load_luts(struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>>> >  /* intel_pipe_crc.c */
>>>> >  int intel_pipe_crc_create(struct drm_minor *minor);
>>>> >  void intel_pipe_crc_cleanup(struct drm_minor *minor);
>>>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>>>> > +int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name,
>>>> > +                        size_t *values_cnt);
>>>> > +#else
>>>> > +static inline int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>>> > +                                      const char *source_name,
>>>> > +                                      size_t *values_cnt) { return 0; }
>>>> > +#endif
>>>>
>>>> "inline" here doesn't work because it's used as a function pointer.
>>>>
>>>> Is it better to have a function that returns 0 for .set_crc_source, or
>>>> to set .set_crc_source to NULL when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n?
>>>
>>> I'd say that whenever we have a function pointer we should have a dummy
>>> function without side-effects for this kind of things.
>>
>> Whoever calls .set_crc_source could do smarter things depending on the
>> hook not being there vs. just silently plunging on.
>
> In this specific case, when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n it doesn't make any
> sense to call that callback, so I think we should have a dummy
> implementation to avoid adding an ifdef to the .c.

We don't want the ifdef to the .c file, but we could do

#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name,
				size_t *values_cnt);
#else
#define intel_crtc_set_crc_source NULL
#endif

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-14 11:50 +0100
  Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API David Weinehall <tao@kernel.org> - 2016-11-15 08:20 +0100
    Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
      Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> - 2016-11-16 13:30 +0100
        Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-16 14:00 +0100
          Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> - 2016-11-16 15:10 +0100
            Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-16 15:10 +0100
              Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/i915: Use new CRC debugfs API Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2016-11-16 15:20 +0100

csiph-web