Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1521825
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/46] Nandsim facelift (part I of II) |
| Date | 2016-11-14 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sDsiR-Vh-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sjMk9-7il-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ssWtY-8bF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Boris, sorry for the late answer. I was not on CC, therefore this mail was unnoticed by me. :-( On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Daniel, Richard, > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:29 +0200 > Daniel Walter <dwalter@sigma-star.at> wrote: > >> Changes since V1: >> Incooperate feedback for nand_cleanup() >> Improve commit messages [..-] > I really like the new approach for 2 reasons: > 1/ it allows creating several NAND devs, and you can do that after the > module has been loaded. > 2/ it fixes the partial NAND detection support by allowing one to > describe its NAND in term of page size, eraseblock size, oob > size, ... > > But I'm wondering if we should not create a new driver instead of > trying to fix the old one (I must admit I haven't been through the 46 > patches of this series, but last time we discussed it on IRC, Richard > said it actually was a complete rewrite of the nandsim driver). > > Moreover, if we specify the flash layout manually, maybe we could make > it an mtdsim driver instead of restricting the emulation to NAND > devices. > > What do you think? I think we don't need a completely new driver. This series just adds functionality to nandsim without much cost, in fact we reuse also some bits from nandsim. If we add a new nandsim alike driver we basically give up the current nandsim and it will die a painful death. This series tries to avoid that. What we can do is splitting nandsim into three files (common, old and new). P.s: Yes, I'm aware of the fact that then I'll have to maintain the beast. ;-\ -- Thanks, //richard
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 00/46] Nandsim facelift (part I of II) Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 17:30 +0100 Re: [PATCH v2 00/46] Nandsim facelift (part I of II) Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-11-20 11:30 +0100
csiph-web