Re: [PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches

From	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches
Date	2016-11-14 16:20 +0100
Message-ID	<sDrd7-eg-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sC1up-MX-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:30:30PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> More fixes missing from the upstream client. Also a nice cleanup
> with the removal of cl_req which is no longer needed. More cleanup
> for lustre_idl.h which is a uapi header. Like the last batch these
> patches are independent of order.

I didn't apply a few of these (string parsing stuff, and build
breakages.)

What's the plan for getting this out of staging?  I feel like you all
are still adding new features along with these "cleanups".  Normally
that's fine, but I really really want to get this out of staging as it's
been there for way too long.  When is that going to happen?

thanks,

greg k-h

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-11-14 16:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-11-14 19:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-11-15 11:10 +0100

csiph-web