Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task

From	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task
Date	2016-11-14 11:30 +0100
Message-ID	<sDmGu-5IO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <sChfQ-35W-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCl9M-5wV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCl9M-5wV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCz33-6bf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDlKp-55b-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 14-11-16, 10:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Any static prio value is wrong (static prio assignment requires system
> knowledge that the kernel doesn't and cannot have), 50 is what threaded
> IRQs default too as well IIRC, so it would at least be consistent with
> that.

Yes you are correct and I have found a better way of defining the
priority in this case using that code instead of magic figure 50.

MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2 :)

-- 
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to  SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-12 06:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to  SCHED_FIFO task Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-14 10:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to  SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-14 11:30 +0100

csiph-web