Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1523210

Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore rproc driver

From Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore rproc driver
Date 2016-11-16 04:30 +0100
Message-ID <sDZ57-5t5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <stzbX-8gZ-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <szxTR-UG-85@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAUbE-4Wh-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDhGN-2pH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDnVT-6qJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:42:16AM +0000, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:57:35PM +0000, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > As you now make changes to the entire remoteproc Kconfig file, rather
> > > > than simply add a Kconfig symbol we can't bring this in via Vinod's tree
> > > > without providing Linus with a messy merge conflict.
> > > > 
> > > > So the remoteproc parts now has to go through my tree.
> > > 
> > > OK, I think the best approach is for Vinod to create an immutable
> > > branch with the entire fdma series on, and then both of you merge that branch into
> > > your respective trees.
> > 
> > my topic/st_fdma is immutable branch. You cna merge it, if you need a signed
> > tag, please do let me know
> 
> OK.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > That way there won't be any conflicts and you can both accept further changes
> > > for v4.9 release. Trying to take half the series via rproc, and half via dma trees won't work
> > > because they have dependencies on each other.
> > > 
> > > I will send a v11 series in a moment which includes the feedback in this email
> > > and also include the additional fixes which Vinod has applied since the driver
> > > has been in linux-next.
> > 
> > WHY.. Stuff is already merged twice!
> 
> When the feedback is "there is an unrelated change in this patch", the only way
> you can fix that is by having a new version of the patch.

It can be reverted and clean patch applied..

-- 
~Vinod

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore  rproc driver Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-11-14 06:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore  rproc driver Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> - 2016-11-14 12:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore  rproc driver Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-11-16 04:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore  rproc driver Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-11-17 07:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore  rproc driver Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-11-17 10:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore  rproc driver Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-11-18 17:50 +0100

csiph-web