Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1522775
| From | Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly |
| Date | 2016-11-15 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sDN3X-69H-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <srPXA-5cV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <srRmF-5Xf-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <ss5fX-6KQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sw4EF-2zg-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDKz7-4pA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Johannes, On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: >>>> Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: >>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=147637177902937&w=2 > > [...] > >>> >>> The rational behind this is, in fc_req_to_bsgjob() we're assigning >>> job->request as req->cmd and job->request_len = req->cmd_len. But without >>> checkinf job->request_len we don't know whether we're save to touch >>> job->request (a.k.a. bsg_request). >> >> Hi Steffen, >> Did you have any chance testing this? I hacked fcping to work with non-FCoE >> and rports as well and tested with FCoE and lpfc. No problems seen from my >> side. I've also pused the series (With this change folded in) to my git >> tree at [1] if this helps you in any way. >> >> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jth/linux.git/log/?h=scsi-bsg-rewrite-v4 >> > > So I finally have a test system up and running. I have good and bad news. The > good news is, I can't get the system crashing with my patches, the bad news is > I can't get zfcp_ping and zfcp_show to output something but HBA_STATUS_ERROR > with my patches and without. Assuming you run the latest package version on s390x: Do steps 2 and 3 of the procedure in http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/linuxonibm/com.ibm.linux.z.lhdd/lhdd_t_fcp_api_runappl.html help? The only other thing I can think of from the top of my head is that BSG ioctls are sensitive regarding ABI and I once had the kernel ioctl return EINVAL due to unmatching kernel-headers and libzfcphbaapi maps this EINVAL to HBA_STATUS_ERROR because there is no more specifically suitable HBA constant [old SUSE bugs 834498 and 834500]. > And btw, I renamed the branch to fc-bsg-rewrite-v4 in case you want to clone > from it (it has patch 2/16 changed to the v3 submission). > > Can you please have a look with your setup? I'm going to re-test hopefully within the next few days. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Steffen Maier Linux on z Systems Development IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2016-11-15 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-15 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2016-11-15 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2016-11-15 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2016-11-16 12:40 +0100
csiph-web