Re: [PATCH v3 05/46] perf/x86/intel/cmt: add per-package locks

From	David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v3 05/46] perf/x86/intel/cmt: add per-package locks
Date	2016-11-15 06:00 +0100
Message-ID	<sDE0F-cO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sxMtX-5GX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxMtX-5GX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sC550-3nm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sC9Lj-6Cw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCerD-1fs-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

> Also, "monr" is a horribly 'word'.

What makes it so bad? (honest question) . Some alternatives:

- res_mon, resm, rmon (Resource Monitor)
- rmnode, rnode, rmon_node (Resource Monitoring node, similar to
Resource Monitor ID, but to reflect that it's a node in a
tree/hierarchy)
 - rdt_mon, rdtm (something with RDT + Monitoring)
 - ment, rdt_ment (Monitoring Entity)

Other suggestions?

Thanks,
David

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 05/46] perf/x86/intel/cmt: add per-package locks David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com> - 2016-11-15 06:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 05/46] perf/x86/intel/cmt: add per-package locks Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-16 20:10 +0100

csiph-web