Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1519714
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery |
| Date | 2016-11-11 12:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCilz-3Hy-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <spEWB-2dt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <spFpD-2pN-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <stC0f-1Ip-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <stC9P-1M3-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCibT-3Ek-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:22:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Once all your locking rework is assembled it might be good to have a > topic branch I could pull in. Both for testing and to handle conflicts > before it goes boom in the merge window ;-) Not necessary ofc, but I > think it'd be useful. Everything except the trylock_recursive is already in tip/locking/core. Ingo, is that all there is in that branch?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> - 2016-11-11 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-11 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-12 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-14 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-14 15:30 +0100
csiph-web