Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1519465

Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs

From "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs
Date 2016-11-11 01:10 +0100
Message-ID <sC7zQ-5dV-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sC1Xw-1gl-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sC278-1l5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sC2Aa-1Ba-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:13:55AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > It's important that user space can figure out what device woke the
>> > system from suspend -- e.g., for debugging, or for implementing
>> > conditional wake behavior. Dedicated wakeup IRQs don't currently do
>> > that.
>> >
>> > Let's report the event (pm_wakeup_event()) and also allow drivers to
>> > synchronize with these events in their resume path (hence, disable_irq()
>> > instead of disable_irq_nosync()).
>>
>> Hmm, dev_pm_disable_wake_irq() is called from
>> rpm_suspend()/rpm_resume() that take dev->power.lock spinlock and
>> disable interrupts. Dropping _nosync() feels dangerous.
>
> Indeed. So how do you suggest we get sane wakeup reports? Every device
> or bus that's going to use the dedicated wake APIs has to
> synchronize_irq() [1] in their resume() routine? Seems like an odd
> implementation detail to have to remember (and therefore most drivers
> will get it wrong).
>
> Brian
>
> [1] Or maybe at least create a helper API that will extract the
> dedicated wake IRQ number and do the synchronize_irq() for us, so
> drivers don't have to stash this separately (or poke at
> dev->power.wakeirq->irq) for no good reason.

Well, in the first place, can anyone please refresh my memory on why
it is necessary to call dev_pm_disable_wake_irq() under power.lock?

Thanks,
Rafael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-11-10 19:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 19:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-11-10 19:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-11-10 21:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-11-10 22:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-11-11 17:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-11-11 20:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-11-11 01:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-11-11 17:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-11-10 22:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: report wakeup events in dedicated wake-IRQs Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-11-10 22:50 +0100

csiph-web