Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1519259

Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device

From Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device
Date 2016-11-10 19:10 +0100
Message-ID <sC1Xx-1gl-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <swq2t-8jC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <swq2u-8jC-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBCw2-el-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBOQx-om-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sC0yl-dI-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10-11-16, 16:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:34:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 09-11-16, 14:58, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:02:56PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> > > > +  Entries for multiple regulators shall be provided in the same field separated
> > > > +  by angular brackets <>. The OPP binding doesn't provide any provisions to
> > > > +  relate the values to their power supplies or the order in which the supplies
> > > > +  need to be configured.
> 
> > > I don't understand how this works.  If we have an unordered list of
> > > values to set for regulators how will we make sense of them?
> 
> > The platform driver is responsible to identify the order and pass it on to the
> > OPP core. And the platform driver needs to have that hard coded.
> 
> That *really* should be in the binding.

Okay, how do you suggest doing that? Will a property like supply-names
in the OPP table be fine? Like this:

@@ -369,13 +378,16 @@ Example 4: Handling multiple regulators
                        compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
                        ...
 
-                       cpu-supply = <&cpu_supply0>, <&cpu_supply1>, <&cpu_supply2>;
+                       vcc0-supply = <&cpu_supply0>;
+                       vcc1-supply = <&cpu_supply1>;
+                       vcc2-supply = <&cpu_supply2>;
                        operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
                };
        };
 
        cpu0_opp_table: opp_table0 {
                compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+               supply-names = "vcc0", "vcc1", "vcc2";
                opp-shared;

-- 
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple  regulators per device Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-11-09 16:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple  regulators per device Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-10 05:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple  regulators per device Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-11-10 17:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple  regulators per device Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-10 19:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple  regulators per device Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-11-11 00:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple  regulators per device Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-11 04:20 +0100

csiph-web