Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1519019
| From | "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list |
| Date | 2016-11-10 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sBYGd-7rk-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <sBWl3-60n-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBWuK-67D-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBWEp-6aV-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBX7r-6lo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBYmR-7lj-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> > I don't think those need be tracked at all, they're immaterial for > > actual scheduling. Once we ioctl() them back to life we can insert > > them into the tree. > > Sure, that sounds fine for scheduling (including big.LITTLE). > > I might still be misunderstanding something, but I don't think that helps > Kan's case: since INACTIVE events which will fail their filters (including the > CPU check) will still be in the tree, they will still have to be iterated over. > > That is, unless we also sort the tree by event->cpu, or if in those cases we > only care about ACTIVE events and can use an active list. Yes, if we can sort the tree by event->cpu, we can minimize the iteration in the perf_iterate_ctx. That should help on reducing the overhead. Thanks, Kan
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list kan.liang@intel.com - 2016-11-09 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-10 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-10 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-10 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-10 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 15:20 +0100
RE: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com> - 2016-11-10 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-10 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] perf/core: introduce context per CPU event list Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 18:10 +0100
csiph-web