Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1518340

Re: sched/autogroup: race if !sysctl_sched_autogroup_enabled ?

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:59:33PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> We need to ensure that autogroup/tg returned by autogroup_task_group()
> can't go away if we race with autogroup_move_group(), and unless the
> caller holds ->siglock we rely on fact that autogroup_move_group()
> will a) see this task and b) do sched_move_task() which needs the same
> same rq->lock.
> 
> However. autogroup_move_group() skips for_each_thread/sched_move_task
> if sysctl_sched_autogroup_enabled == 0.
> 
> So. Doesn't this mean that cgroup migration to the root cgroup can race
> with autogroup_move_group() and use the soon-to-be-freed autogroup->tg?

Argh, its too late for this, also jet-lag. But maybe, I can sort of feel
a hole here but cannot for the life of me still think.


> although this is a bit off-topic. Another question is that I fail to
> understand why sched_autogroup_create_attach() does autogroup_create()
> and changes signal->autogroup even if !sysctl_sched_autogroup_enabled.

I really cannot remember back that far, but it could be to allow
flipping it back on. Then again, I don't think the fork path puts new
tasks in, even if the autogroup exists.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

sched/autogroup: race if !sysctl_sched_autogroup_enabled ? Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-11-09 18:00 +0100
  Re: sched/autogroup: race if !sysctl_sched_autogroup_enabled ? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-09 19:00 +0100
    Re: sched/autogroup: race if !sysctl_sched_autogroup_enabled ? Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-11-10 14:20 +0100
      Re: sched/autogroup: race if !sysctl_sched_autogroup_enabled ? Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-11-11 18:00 +0100

csiph-web