Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1518269
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage |
| Date | 2016-11-09 16:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sBDip-KX-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sBc8y-8ek-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBc8y-8ek-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBf6r-1Bm-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBhUC-3qu-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBD8K-HA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09.11.2016 16:32, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:52:04AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> This should go into 4.9, >>>> and into all stable branches since and including v4.0, >>>> which is the first to contain the exposing change. >>>> >>>> It is correct for all stable branches older than that as well >>>> (which contain the DRBD driver; which is 2.6.33 and up). >>>> >>>> It requires a small "conflict" resolution for v4.4 and earlier, with v4.5 >>>> we dropped the comment block immediately preceding the kernel_sendmsg(). >>>> >>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >>>> Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk >>>> Cc: christoph.lechleitner@iteg.at >>>> Cc: wolfgang.glas@iteg.at >>>> Reported-by: Christoph Lechleitner <christoph.lechleitner@iteg.at> >>>> Tested-by: Christoph Lechleitner <christoph.lechleitner@iteg.at> >>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> >>> >>> Changing my patch is perfectly fine, but please clearly state it. >>> I.e. by adding something like that before your S-o-b. >>> [Lars: Massaged patch to match my personal taste...] >> > >> Lars, are you sending a new one? If you do, add the stable tag as well. > > So my "change" against his original patch was > - rv = kernel_sendmsg(sock, &msg, &iov, 1, size - sent); > + rv = kernel_sendmsg(sock, &msg, &iov, 1, iov.iov_len); > to make it "more obviously correct" from looking just at the one line > without even having to read the context. And a more verbose commit message. > > If that requires yet additional noise, sure, so be it :) > > Should I sent two patches, one that applies to 4.5 and later, > and one that applies to 2.6.33 ... 4.4, or are you or stable > willing to resolve the trivial "missing comment block" conflict yourself? BTW: Why did you drop the "Fixes:" tag too? Thanks, //richard
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-08 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-08 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-11-08 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> - 2016-11-09 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-09 16:50 +0100
Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> - 2016-11-09 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-11-09 18:00 +0100
[PATCH v2] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage - potential NULL deref Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> - 2016-11-09 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage - potential NULL deref Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-11-10 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Christoph Lechleitner <christoph.lechleitner@iteg.at> - 2016-11-08 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-11-08 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-08 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-11-08 17:20 +0100
csiph-web