Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1518261

Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation

From luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation
Date 2016-11-09 16:30 +0100
Message-ID <sBCZ3-Ei-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <sBiQG-40g-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBja2-4re-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBjMJ-4Jv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBk65-57F-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBkSu-5IO-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:02:29 +0000
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
> > > So, it actually matters for next patch,
> > > not here. But, maybe we want to do things clean from start?  
> > You mean, because patch 2/6 adds
> > +       if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer)) {
> > +               raw_spin_lock_irq(&task_rq(p)->lock);
> > +               sub_running_bw(&p->dl, dl_rq_of_se(&p->dl));
> > +               raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task_rq(p)->lock);
> > +       }
> > in task_dead_dl()? I suspect this hunk is actually unneeded (worse, it
> > is wrong :). I am trying to remember why it is there, but I cannot find
> > any reason... In the next days, I'll run some tests to check if that
> > hunk is actually needed. If yes, then I'll modify patch 1/6 as you
> > suggest; if it is not needed, I'll remove it from patch 2/6 and I'll
> > not do this change to patch 1/6... Is this ok?
> >   
> 
> I guess yes, if we don't need to differentiate.
Ok; so, I ran some tests (and I found some old notes of mine). The
modifications to task_dead_dl() mentioned above are not actually needed;
I added them as a preparation for a change needed by patch 3... But I
now think this was an error; I am reworking this part of the code
(removing changes from task_dead_dl() and adding a "p->state == TASK_DEAD"
check in the inactive timer handler).

I'll post an update for patches 2 and 3 in few days, after I finish
some more tests.



				Luca

> Maybe just add a comment as I  am saying above?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Juri

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-11-01 17:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-11-01 22:20 +0100
    Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-11-08 19:00 +0100
      Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-11-08 19:20 +0100
        Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-11-08 20:00 +0100
          Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-11-08 20:20 +0100
            Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-11-08 21:10 +0100
              Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-11-09 16:30 +0100
      Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-11-09 17:30 +0100

csiph-web