Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1516641
| From | Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new |
| Date | 2016-11-07 23:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sB0TL-12R-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sAzgS-8hj-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAzqy-8kr-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAZO1-ic-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Nov 7, 2016, at 4:33 PM, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2016, at 10:26, Drokin, Oleg <oleg.drokin@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>
>>> 'lustre_cfg_new()' can return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM).
>>> Handle these errors and propagate the error code to the callers.
>>>
>>> Error handling has been rearranged in 'lustre_process_log()' with the
>>> addition of a label in order to free some resources.
>>
>> I wonder if we should just make it return NULL on allocation failure,
>> and then at least the other error handling that is there (i.e. in your other patch)
>> would become correct.
>> This would make handling in mgc_apply_recover_logs incorrect, but it's already
>> geared towards this sort of handling anyway, as it discards the passed error
>> and sets ENOMEM unconditionally (just need to revert 3092c34a in a way).
>
> I'd agree with Oleg that returning NULL is the preferable solution here.
>
> There are also callers of lustre_cfg_new() in class_config_llog_handler(),
> do_lcfg(), and lustre_end_log() that do not check error returns at all that
> should be fixed at the same time.
This patch was actually doing it.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
>>> index 59fbc29aae94..5473615cd338 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
>>> @@ -89,11 +89,14 @@ int lustre_process_log(struct super_block *sb, char *logname,
>>> lustre_cfg_bufs_set(bufs, 2, cfg, sizeof(*cfg));
>>> lustre_cfg_bufs_set(bufs, 3, &sb, sizeof(sb));
>>> lcfg = lustre_cfg_new(LCFG_LOG_START, bufs);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(lcfg)) {
>>> + rc = PTR_ERR(lcfg);
>>> + goto out_free;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> rc = obd_process_config(mgc, sizeof(*lcfg), lcfg);
>>> lustre_cfg_free(lcfg);
>>>
>>> - kfree(bufs);
>>> -
>>> if (rc == -EINVAL)
>>> LCONSOLE_ERROR_MSG(0x15b, "%s: The configuration from log '%s' failed from the MGS (%d). Make sure this client and the MGS are running compatible versions of Lustre.\n",
>>> mgc->obd_name, logname, rc);
>>> @@ -104,6 +107,9 @@ int lustre_process_log(struct super_block *sb, char *logname,
>>> rc);
>>>
>>> /* class_obd_list(); */
>>> +
>>> +out_free:
>>> + kfree(bufs);
>>> return rc;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(lustre_process_log);
>>> @@ -127,6 +133,9 @@ int lustre_end_log(struct super_block *sb, char *logname,
>>> if (cfg)
>>> lustre_cfg_bufs_set(&bufs, 2, cfg, sizeof(*cfg));
>>> lcfg = lustre_cfg_new(LCFG_LOG_END, &bufs);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(lcfg))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(lcfg);
>>> +
>>> rc = obd_process_config(mgc, sizeof(*lcfg), lcfg);
>>> lustre_cfg_free(lcfg);
>>> return rc;
>>> @@ -159,6 +168,9 @@ static int do_lcfg(char *cfgname, lnet_nid_t nid, int cmd,
>>> lustre_cfg_bufs_set_string(&bufs, 4, s4);
>>>
>>> lcfg = lustre_cfg_new(cmd, &bufs);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(lcfg))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(lcfg);
>>> +
>>> lcfg->lcfg_nid = nid;
>>> rc = class_process_config(lcfg);
>>> lustre_cfg_free(lcfg);
>>> --
>>> 2.9.3
>>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> - 2016-11-06 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> - 2016-11-06 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-11-07 05:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-11-07 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com> - 2016-11-07 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> - 2016-11-07 23:50 +0100
csiph-web