Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1516488

Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place

From "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place
Date 2016-11-07 20:00 +0100
Message-ID <sAXjd-74X-51@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <szrEO-5cN-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <szrEP-5cN-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAX9w-71s-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:45:32PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Part of the init (memory allocation and so on) is done
> > in mcheck_cpu_init(). While moving the the allocation to
> > mcheck_init_device() (where the hotplug calls are initialized) it
> > becomes necessary to move the callback (mcheck_cpu_init()), too.
> > 
> > The callback is now removed from identify_cpu() and registered as a
> > hotplug event which is invoked as the very first one which is shortly
> > after the original point of invocation (look at smp_store_cpu_info() and
> > notify_cpu_starting() in smp_callin()).
> > One "visible" difference is that MCE for the boot CPU is not enabled at
> > identify_boot_cpu() time but at device_initcall_sync() time. Either way,
> > both times we had no userland around.
> 
> Uh, hm, I'm not sure about this: so the issue I see with this is that
> the more we're delaying the enabling or MCE reporting - and especially
> setting CR4[MCE] - the more we're increasing the window where a MCE
> during early boot will cause a shutdown. (This is what happens if
> CR4[MCE]=0b).
> 
> Perhaps we should split the init into a very early init which doesn't
> need to be part of hotplug and the rest, which can do mce_disable_cpu()
> and mce_reenable_cpu().
> 
> Tony, how do you see this?

I don't think that helps as much as you'd like it to help (at
least on Intel). A broadcast machine check that finds the boot
CPU has set CR4[MCE]=1 is still going to end up in reset if any
other CPU still has CR4[MCE]=0

-Tony

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-03 16:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-07 19:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2016-11-07 20:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-07 21:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-08 10:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-09 15:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-09 16:40 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-09 17:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-09 18:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-09 18:30 +0100
              RE: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2016-11-09 19:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 10:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-10 10:20 +0100
                [PATCH 4/7] x86/mcheck: Split threshold_cpu_callback into two callbacks Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 18:50 +0100
                [PATCH 3/7] x86/mcheck: Be prepared for a rollback back to the ONLINE state Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 18:50 +0100
                [PATCH 1/7] x86/mcheck: Move threshold_create_device() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 18:50 +0100
                [PATCH 5/7] x86/mcheck: reorganize the hotplug callbacks Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 18:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86/mcheck: reorganize the hotplug callbacks Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-11 20:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86/mcheck: reorganize the hotplug callbacks Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-11 20:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86/mcheck: reorganize the hotplug callbacks Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-11 21:00 +0100
                [PATCH 2/7] x86/mcheck: Explicit cleanup on failure in mce_amd Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 18:50 +0100
                [PATCH 6/7] x86/mcheck: Move CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_PREPARE to hotplug state machine Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 18:50 +0100
                [PATCH 7/7] x86/mcheck: Move CPU_DEAD to hotplug state machine Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 18:50 +0100
                x86/mcheck: convert to hotplug state engine, take #2 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 18:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 11:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/25] x86/mcheck: Do the init in one place Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-10 11:30 +0100

csiph-web