Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1515990
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 20/25] x86/mcheck: Be prepared for a rollback back to the ONLINE state |
| Date | 2016-11-07 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sAPvj-1Se-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <szrEO-5cN-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <szrEO-5cN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:50:16PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> If we try a CPU down and fail in the middle then we roll back to the
> online state. This means we would perform CPU_ONLINE()
> without invoking CPU_DEAD() for the cleanup of what was allocated in
Are CPU_ONLINE() and CPU_DEAD() functions? Those are the states, right?
> CPU_ONLINE.
> Be prepared for this and don't allocate the struct if we have it
> already.
>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index a7fdf453d895..e9ffd6d9e32d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -2409,6 +2409,10 @@ static int mce_device_create(unsigned int cpu)
> if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data))
> return -EIO;
>
> + dev = per_cpu(mce_device, cpu);
> + if (dev)
> + return 0;
> +
> dev = kzalloc(sizeof *dev, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
> index 55cd018bc1ae..3e529fd747f8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,9 @@ static int threshold_create_device(unsigned int cpu)
> struct threshold_bank **bp;
> int err = 0;
>
> + bp = per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu);
> + if (bp)
> + return 0;
<--- newline here.
> bp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct threshold_bank *) * mca_cfg.banks,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!bp)
> --
> 2.10.2
>
>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 20/25] x86/mcheck: Be prepared for a rollback back to the ONLINE state Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-03 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 20/25] x86/mcheck: Be prepared for a rollback back to the ONLINE state Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-07 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 20/25] x86/mcheck: Be prepared for a rollback back to the ONLINE state Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-07 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 20/25] x86/mcheck: Be prepared for a rollback back to the ONLINE state Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-11-07 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 20/25] x86/mcheck: Be prepared for a rollback back to the ONLINE state Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-07 18:30 +0100
csiph-web