Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1515802
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] i2c: use an IRQ to report Host Notify events, not alert |
| Date | 2016-11-07 01:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sAFYZ-44h-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <srN9n-3q6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <srN9n-3q6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:10:40PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > The current SMBus Host Notify implementation relies on .alert() to > relay its notifications. However, the use cases where SMBus Host > Notify is needed currently is to signal data ready on touchpads. > > This is closer to an IRQ than a custom API through .alert(). > Given that the 2 touchpad manufacturers (Synaptics and Elan) that > use SMBus Host Notify don't put any data in the SMBus payload, the > concept actually matches one to one. I see the advantages. The only question I have: What if we encounter devices in the future which do put data in the payload? Can this mechanism be extended to handle that? > > Benefits are multiple: > - simpler code and API: the client will just have an IRQ, and > nothing needs to be added in the adapter beside internally > enabling it. > - no more specific workqueue, the threading is handled by IRQ core > directly (when required) > - no more races when removing the device (the drivers are already > required to disable irq on remove) > - simpler handling for drivers: use plain regular IRQs > - no more dependency on i2c-smbus for i2c-i801 (and any other adapter) > - the IRQ domain is created automatically when the adapter exports > the Host Notify capability > - the IRQ are assign only if ACPI, OF and the caller did not assign > one already > - the domain is automatically destroyed on remove > - fewer lines of code (minus 20, yeah!) > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Thanks for keeping at it!
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] i2c: use an IRQ to report Host Notify events, not alert Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-11-07 01:30 +0100 Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] i2c: use an IRQ to report Host Notify events, not alert Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> - 2016-11-07 17:20 +0100
csiph-web