Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1468617

Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm: introduce get_task_exe_file

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:48:13PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >
> > +struct file *get_task_exe_file(struct task_struct *task)
> > +{
> > +	struct file *exe_file = NULL;
> > +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> > +
> > +	task_lock(task);
> > +	mm = task->mm;
> > +	if (mm) {
> > +		if (!(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
> > +			exe_file = get_mm_exe_file(mm);
> > +	}
> > +	task_unlock(task);
> > +	return exe_file;
> > +}
> 
> I can't believe I am going to comment the coding style but I can't resist ;)
> 
> 	if (mm && !(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD)))
> 		exe_file = get_mm_exe_file(mm);
> 
> looks a bit simpler to me. But this is purely cosmetic and subjective,
> both patches look good to me.
> 

Actually I did it for some consistency with get_task_mm.

The check can likely be done prior to taking the lock in both functions
and that would clean them up a little bit, but I wanted to avoid nit
picking... :>

> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> 

Thanks

-- 
Mateusz Guzik

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCHv2 1/2] mm: introduce get_task_exe_file Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com> - 2016-08-23 16:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm: introduce get_task_exe_file Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-08-23 16:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm: introduce get_task_exe_file Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com> - 2016-08-23 17:10 +0200

csiph-web