Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1468602
| From | Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V5 9/9] coresight: etm-perf: incorporating sink definition from cmd line |
| Date | 2016-08-23 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s9lbz-5jv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s511M-6al-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <s511O-6al-93@gated-at.bofh.it> <s90A9-iZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 22 August 2016 at 10:40, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> +enum {
>> + ETM_TOKEN_SINK_CPU,
>> + ETM_TOKEN_SINK,
>> + ETM_TOKEN_ERR,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const match_table_t drv_cfg_tokens = {
>> + {ETM_TOKEN_SINK_CPU, "sink=cpu%d:%s"},
>> + {ETM_TOKEN_SINK, "sink=%s"},
>> + {ETM_TOKEN_ERR, NULL},
>> +};
>
> Wait, but we just parsed away the '=' and the whole thing is now a
> linked list of { key, value }?
You're correct. From a parsing point of view it was better to
reassemble the string and parse the whole thing again. As suggested
in my previous email if the parsing for "sink=xyz" is done in the
core we won't have to do this part.
>
> This also answers my question from the other email about the use cases
> for sending in ascii strings. In my opinion, all this is completely
> unnecessary.
>
>> +static int
>> +etm_set_drv_configs(struct perf_event *event,
>> + struct list_head *drv_configs)
>> +{
>> + char *config, *sink;
>> + int len;
>> + struct perf_drv_config *drv_config;
>> + void *old_sink;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(drv_config, drv_configs, entry) {
>> + /* ETM HW configuration needs a sink specification */
>> + if (!drv_config->option)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + len = strlen(drv_config->config) + strlen("=") +
>> + strlen(drv_config->option) + 1;
>> +
>> + config = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!config)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Reconstruct user configuration */
>> + snprintf(config, len, "%s=%s",
>> + drv_config->config, drv_config->option);
>
> Wait, what? We parse this *twice*?
>
> There's basically a malloc+snprintf[which could have been
> kasprintf()]+match_token just to see if drv_config::option starts with a
> 'cpu%d:'?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Alex
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V5 9/9] coresight: etm-perf: incorporating sink definition from cmd line Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2016-08-11 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 9/9] coresight: etm-perf: incorporating sink definition from cmd line Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-08-22 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 9/9] coresight: etm-perf: incorporating sink definition from cmd line Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2016-08-23 16:50 +0200
csiph-web