Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1469995
| From | Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] clk: qcom: Add .is_enabled ops for clk-alpha-pll |
| Date | 2016-08-25 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s9YZk-7vE-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s4TQB-1tP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4TQC-1tP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9zRf-6Oo-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 08/24/2016 11:58 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 08/11, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> This would be useful in subsequent patches when the .set_rate operation >> would need to identify if the PLL is actually enabled >> >> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> >> --- > > Hmmm I suspect I never implemented the is_enabled op because that > will happen to turn off clks during late init that shouldn't > otherwise be disabled because the framework now can see that some > PLL is enabled out of the bootloader. Is that happening now? We > really should fix the framework to make this not be a problem, > mostly by finishing off the clk handoff patches that Mike posted > a while back. But either way, I'm worried with these patches that > implement is_enabled ops. I did not see any, but will try and test some more to see if we indeed run into such issues -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 09/10] clk: qcom: Add .is_enabled ops for clk-alpha-pll Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-11 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] clk: qcom: Add .is_enabled ops for clk-alpha-pll Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-24 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] clk: qcom: Add .is_enabled ops for clk-alpha-pll Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-25 11:20 +0200
csiph-web