Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1469173
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 19/19] iommu/dma: Add support for mapping MSIs |
| Date | 2016-08-24 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s9BJo-85b-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s9pfc-880-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9pfc-880-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Robin Murphy wrote:
> + cookie = domain->iova_cookie;
> + iovad = &cookie->iovad;
> +
> + spin_lock(&cookie->msi_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(msi_page, &cookie->msi_page_list, list)
> + if (msi_page->phys_hi == msg->address_hi &&
> + msi_page->phys_lo - msg->address_lo < iovad->granule)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + ret = __iommu_dma_map_msi_page(dev, msg, domain, &msi_page);
> +unlock:
> + spin_unlock(&cookie->msi_lock);
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_page->iova);
> + msg->address_lo &= iova_mask(iovad);
> + msg->address_lo += lower_32_bits(msi_page->iova);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * We're called from a void callback, so the best we can do is
> + * 'fail' by filling the message with obviously bogus values.
> + * Since we got this far due to an IOMMU being present, it's
> + * not like the existing address would have worked anyway...
> + */
> + msg->address_hi = ~0U;
> + msg->address_lo = ~0U;
> + msg->data = ~0U;
> + }
The above is really horrible to parse. I had to read it five times to
understand the logic.
static struct iommu_dma_msi_page *
find_or_map_msi_page(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie, struct msi_msg *msg)
{
struct iova_domain *iovad = &cookie->iovad;
struct iommu_dma_msi_page *page;
list_for_each_entry(*page, &cookie->msi_page_list, list) {
if (page->phys_hi == msg->address_hi &&
page->phys_lo - msg->address_lo < iovad->granule)
return page;
}
/*
* FIXME: __iommu_dma_map_msi_page() should return a page or NULL.
* The integer return value is pretty pointless. If seperate error
* codes are required that's what ERR_PTR() is for ....
*/
ret = __iommu_dma_map_msi_page(dev, msg, domain, &page);
return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : page;
}
So now the code in iommu_dma_map_msi_msg() becomes:
spin_lock(&cookie->msi_lock);
msi_page = find_or_map_msi_page(cookie, msg);
spin_unlock(&cookie->msi_lock);
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(msi_page)) {
msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_page->iova);
msg->address_lo &= iova_mask(iovad);
msg->address_lo += lower_32_bits(msi_page->iova);
} else {
/*
* We're called from a void callback, so the best we can do is
* 'fail' by filling the message with obviously bogus values.
* Since we got this far due to an IOMMU being present, it's
* not like the existing address would have worked anyway...
*/
msg->address_hi = ~0U;
msg->address_lo = ~0U;
msg->data = ~0U;
}
Hmm?
Thanks,
tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 19/19] iommu/dma: Add support for mapping MSIs Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-08-23 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 19/19] iommu/dma: Add support for mapping MSIs Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-08-24 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 19/19] iommu/dma: Add support for mapping MSIs Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-08-24 12:40 +0200
csiph-web