Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1467441
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] mm/hugetlb: Introduce ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE |
| Date | 2016-08-22 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s8SsV-3Ku-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s8NCV-mn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8NCV-mn-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon 22-08-16 10:56:42, Xie Yisheng wrote: > Avoid making ifdef get pretty unwieldy if many ARCHs support gigantic page. > No functional change with this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yisheng <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> > --- > arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + > fs/Kconfig | 4 ++++ > mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig > index e751fe2..a8c8fa3 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ config S390 > select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED > select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE > select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL > + select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE > select ARCH_HAS_KCOV > select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN > select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > index c580d8c..5cf959c 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ config X86 > select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE > select ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER > select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL > + select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE if X86_64 > select ARCH_HAS_KCOV if X86_64 > select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API if X86_64 > select ARCH_HAS_MMIO_FLUSH good > diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig > index 2bc7ad7..b77ad0f 100644 > --- a/fs/Kconfig > +++ b/fs/Kconfig > @@ -199,6 +199,10 @@ config HUGETLBFS > config HUGETLB_PAGE > def_bool HUGETLBFS > > +config ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE > + depends on HUGETLB_PAGE > + bool > + but is this really necessary? The code where we use ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE already depends on HUGETLB_PAGE. Other than that looks good to me and a nice simplification. > source "fs/configfs/Kconfig" > source "fs/efivarfs/Kconfig" > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > index 87e11d8..8488dcc 100644 > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c > @@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ static int hstate_next_node_to_free(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed) > ((node = hstate_next_node_to_free(hs, mask)) || 1); \ > nr_nodes--) > > -#if (defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_S390)) && \ > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE) && \ > ((defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION) && defined(CONFIG_COMPACTION)) || \ > defined(CONFIG_CMA)) > static void destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page, > -- > 1.7.12.4 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH v2 1/2] mm/hugetlb: Introduce ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE Xie Yisheng <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> - 2016-08-22 05:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] mm/hugetlb: Introduce ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-08-22 10:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] mm/hugetlb: Introduce ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> - 2016-08-22 13:00 +0200
csiph-web