Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1465173
| From | Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH][RFC v4] timekeeping: ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled |
| Date | 2016-08-18 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s7tmW-7oo-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s7sTT-6Vc-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7t3z-6Zk-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016/08/18 at 18:36, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 18:43 +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
>> Previously we encountered some memory overflow issues due to
>> the bogus sleep time brought by inconsistent rtc, which is
>> triggered when pm_trace is enabled, please refer to:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9286365/
>> It's improper in the first place to call __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime()
>> in case that pm_trace is enabled simply because that "hash" time value
>> will wreckage the timekeeping subsystem.
> Hi,
>
> do you know since when this bug exists?
Hi Oliver,
I think it should be since __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime() was updated to use @delta
of timespec64 type, which lets it survive the former timespec_valid_strict() check and
then results in an index larger than 31 into sleep_time_bin[] in subsequent call.
Regards,
Xunlei
>
>> /**
>> @@ -1662,6 +1668,12 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
>> } else if (timespec64_compare(&ts_new, &timekeeping_suspend_time) > 0) {
>> ts_delta = timespec64_sub(ts_new, timekeeping_suspend_time);
>> sleeptime_injected = true;
>> + /*
>> + * If rtc is used as persist clock thus it
>> + * would be bogus when pm_trace is enabled.
>> + */
>> + if (!persistent_clock_is_usable())
>> + sleeptime_injected = false;
>> }
>>
>> if (sleeptime_injected)
> How about
>
> sleeptime_injected = persistent_clock_is_usable();
>
> Regards
> Oliver
>
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH][RFC v4] timekeeping: ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-08-18 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH][RFC v4] timekeeping: ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> - 2016-08-18 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH][RFC v4] timekeeping: ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> - 2016-08-18 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH][RFC v4] timekeeping: ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-08-18 13:20 +0200
csiph-web