Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1464817
| From | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] proc: Add LSM hook checks to /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns |
| Date | 2016-08-17 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s7gJ3-6VE-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rXsLv-405-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXsLv-405-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7gzn-6R5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:24 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: >> As requested, this patch checks the existing LSM hooks >> task_getscheduler/task_setscheduler when reading or modifying >> the task's timerslack value. >> >> Previous versions added new get/settimerslack LSM hooks, but >> since they checked the same PROCESS__SET/GETSCHED values as >> existing hooks, it was suggested we just use the existing ones. >> >> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> >> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> >> CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> >> Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com> >> Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com> >> Cc: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com> >> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> >> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> >> Cc: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> >> Cc: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com> >> Cc: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com> >> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> >> Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com> >> Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov >> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> >> --- >> v2: >> * Initial swing at adding settimerslack LSM hook >> v3: >> * Fix current/p switchup bug noted by NickK >> * Add gettimerslack hook suggested by NickK >> v4: >> * Dropped adding get/settimerslack LSM hooks, and >> just reuse the get/setscheduler ones. >> >> fs/proc/base.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > For some reason I'm having a hard time finding patch 1/2 in the > patchset, but this patch looks reasonable to me. We already have some https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/21/522 > LSM checking via the ptrace_may_access() call, but this adds some > additional granularity which could be a good thing. > > Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Thanks. There's also this follow-on patch (and discussion thread) that adds a fix to the 1/2 patch linked above. https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/9/876 thanks -john
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] proc: Add LSM hook checks to /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2016-08-17 23:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] proc: Add LSM hook checks to /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-08-17 23:40 +0200
csiph-web