Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1465929
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt/bindings: arm-pl330: add description of arm,pl330-periph-burst |
| Date | 2016-08-19 04:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s7HSW-892-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <s2DZD-26z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2HJU-4rz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4aTw-5c9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4bmx-5B6-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <s74eR-6Pr-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:11:03PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: > Hi, Vinod and Lars-Peter > > Ping.. Any better idea to share :) > > On 2016/8/9 17:12, Shawn Lin wrote: > >Hi Lars-Peter, > > > >在 2016/8/9 16:39, Lars-Peter Clausen 写道: > >>On 08/05/2016 09:25 AM, Shawn Lin wrote: > >>>Hi Vinod, > >>> > >>>在 2016/8/5 11:34, Vinod Koul 写道: > >>>>On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:53:20AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: > >>>>>This patch adds the "arm,pl330-periph-burst" for arm-pl330 to > >>>>>support busrt mode. > >>>> > >>>>why should this be DT property. Only reason I can think of if some hw > >>>>versions support this and some won't. > >>> > >>>yes, if we want to support burst mode, both of the master(pl330) and > >>>client(several peripherals) should implement it, otherwise it will > >>>be broken when enabling. > >> > >>As you said, it is up to the consumer peripheral whether it supports > >>BURST, > >>SINGLE or both. So this is a per client property, but you specify this > >>as a > >>a global property on the producer side. > > > >Thanks for comment. > > > >yup, but what is the proper way to add it ? :) > > > > > >a) If pl330 support BURST as well as all the peripherals, we could > >enable it. > > > >b) If pl300 support BURST, but all the peripherals don't support it, > >we could not enable it. > > > >c) If pl300 support BURST, but not all the peripherals support it, > >we also could not enable it. > > > >the burst feature of peripheral IP may be vendor-specific, but the > >common driver for this peripheral are used for many many vendors which > >means we could not check all of this info. It's very likely to break > >them... I couldn't figure out how many upstreamed peripheral drivers > >who are using pl300 either. > > > >So this check should be done by all this vendors but we could make > >sure we don't break them before they check a), b), c), right? Since support for BURST needs to be from peripheral too, we should have that as a property for peripheral not for controller. The peripheral drivers can communicate the burst to be used to pl330 using src_maxburst/dst_maxburst in dma_slave_config. We can use this value to indicate the DMA should be single (a value of 0) or burst with "burst" value. -- ~Vinod
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt/bindings: arm-pl330: add description of arm,pl330-periph-burst Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-17 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt/bindings: arm-pl330: add description of arm,pl330-periph-burst Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-08-19 04:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt/bindings: arm-pl330: add description of arm,pl330-periph-burst Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-21 03:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt/bindings: arm-pl330: add description of arm,pl330-periph-burst Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-08-22 08:00 +0200
csiph-web