Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1464594
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning |
| Date | 2016-08-17 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s79xT-1My-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <s6HrY-fU-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6Otr-4M4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6OD8-4QG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6OMN-4U7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6V1T-yS-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, Heiko. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:19:53AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > I think the easiest solution would be to simply assign all cpus, for which > we do not have any topology information, to an arbitrary node; e.g. round > robin. > > After all the case that cpus are added later is rare and the s390 fake numa > implementation does not know about the memory topology. All it is doing is Ah, okay, so there really is no requirement for a newly coming up cpu to be on a specific node. > distributing the memory to several nodes in order to avoid a single huge > node. So that should be sort of ok. Sounds good to me. If that's the only purpose, we don't lose much by round-robining the possible CPUs on boot and sticking with the mapping. Thanks. -- tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-08-15 13:20 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-08-16 00:50 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-08-16 10:00 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-08-16 17:30 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-08-16 17:40 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-08-16 17:50 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-08-17 00:30 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-17 11:30 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-08-17 16:00 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-18 11:40 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-08-18 16:50 +0200
Re: [bisected] "sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active" causes warning Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-19 12:00 +0200
csiph-web