Re: [PATCH 3.2 44/94] wext: Fix 32 bit iwpriv compatibility issue with 64 bit Kernel

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 3.2 44/94] wext: Fix 32 bit iwpriv compatibility issue with 64 bit Kernel
Date	Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:10:01 +0200
Message-ID	<s6yeZ-327-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<s61M7-7m3-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6j6h-1AG-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Enq3O8sW2EFvOGIyMIrO"
X-Mailer	Evolution 3.20.4-1
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP	109.148.166.21
X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From	ben@decadent.org.uk
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned	No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID	<linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	55
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Prasun Maiti <prasunmaiti87@gmail.com>, Ujjal Roy <royujjal@gmail.com>, Dibyajyoti Ghosh <dibyajyotig@gmail.com>
X-Original-Date	Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:05:00 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<1471298700.13300.28.camel@decadent.org.uk>
X-Original-References	<lsq.1471110178.555563985@decadent.org.uk> <1471240271.16783.3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
X-Original-Sender	linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref	csiph.com linux.kernel:1463201

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 07:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 17:42 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 
> > 3.2.82-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > > > From: Prasun Maiti <prasunmaiti87@gmail.com>
> > 
> > commit 3d5fdff46c4b2b9534fa2f9fc78e90a48e0ff724 upstream.
> > 
> 
> Did you just include this by accident? You had pointed out yourself
> that this was broken if anything but iwpoint was transferred, and since
> the Marvell people shouldn't be using wext anyway I reverted it
> already.

Yes, this was an accident and I'll drop it.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 3.2 44/94] wext: Fix 32 bit iwpriv compatibility issue  with 64 bit Kernel Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-08-14 13:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 3.2 44/94] wext: Fix 32 bit iwpriv compatibility issue  with 64 bit Kernel Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2016-08-15 08:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3.2 44/94] wext: Fix 32 bit iwpriv compatibility issue  with 64 bit Kernel Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-08-16 00:10 +0200

csiph-web