Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1464147
| From | Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | linux next naive question |
| Date | 2016-08-16 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s6Tt7-7TM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Now in plain text] Hi Stephan, For preparing linux-next is there a specific merge strategy / script foo for pulling branches from same developers repo. So for ARC there's for-curr and for-next, and a lot of times they might have potentially conflicting changes, base lines etc. It seem in linux-next for-curr is added first and then for-next - a very likely case is for-next being significantly behind for-curr with a few straggler changes. The reason I ask is we want to implement something similar in our existing regression setup - which builds / boot/ test jobs on several platforms but currently only uses my kernel.org repo's for-next - I want to expose both the branches w/o having to explicitly replicate duplicate changes in my for-next from for-curr Thx, -Vineet
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux next naive question Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-08-16 22:50 +0200
csiph-web