Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1459061
| From | Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: Convert fsl_rstcr_restart to a reset handler |
| Date | 2016-08-09 20:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s4kga-2PC-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s02Bb-4AR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s02Bb-4AR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <s1d1v-1qO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:07:18 -0700
> Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Convert fsl_rstcr_restart into a function to be registered with
>> register_reset_handler().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>
>> - fsl_rstcr_restart is registered as a reset handler in
>> setup_rstcr, replacing per-board arch_initcall approach
>
> Bear in mind I don't know much about the embedded or platform code!
>
> The documentation for reset notifiers says that they are expected
> to be registered from drivers, not arch code. That seems to only be
> intended to mean that the standard ISA or platform reset would
> normally be handled directly by the arch, whereas if you have an
> arch specific driver for a reset hardware that just happens to live
> under arch/, then fsl_rstcr_restart / mpc85xx_cds_restart would be
> valid use of reset notifier.
Yeah, IMHO there's quite a bit of code in sysdev/ which in ideal world
would go into drivers/ and I think fsl_rstcr_restart is among it
(similar example on MIPS is drivers/power/reset/brcmstb-reboot.c).
>
> So this change seems reasonable to me. One small question:
>
>
>> +static int mpc85xx_cds_restart_register(void)
>> +{
>> + static struct notifier_block restart_handler;
>> +
>> + restart_handler.notifier_call = mpc85xx_cds_restart;
>> + restart_handler.priority = 192;
>
> Should there be a header with #define's for these priorities?
I don't have any strong preference either way, I do however think that
introducing such #define should go into a separate patch-set, since
you'd probably want to propagate that change across all of the users
of the API.
Thanks,
Andrey
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: Convert fsl_rstcr_restart to a reset handler Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: Convert fsl_rstcr_restart to a reset handler Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: Convert fsl_rstcr_restart to a reset handler Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: Convert fsl_rstcr_restart to a reset handler Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 03:00 +0200
csiph-web