Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1460475

Re: [RFC 3/4] Documentation: move dma-buf documentation to rst

Show all headers | View raw

Hello Jani,

On 11 August 2016 at 17:17, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/dma-buf/guide.rst b/Documentation/dma-buf/guide.rst
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..fd3534fdccb3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/dma-buf/guide.rst
>> @@ -0,0 +1,503 @@
>> +
>> +.. _dma-buf-guide:
>> +
>> +============================
>> +DMA Buffer Sharing API Guide
>> +============================
>> +
>> +Sumit Semwal - sumit.semwal@linaro.org, sumits@kernel.org
>
> Please use the format
>
> :author: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
>
Thanks very much for reviewing!
> ---
>
> While on this subject, please excuse me for hijacking the thread a bit.
>
> Personally, I believe it would be better to leave out authorship notes
> from documentation and source files in collaborative projects. Of
> course, it is only fair that people who deserve credit get the
> credit. Listing the authors in the file is often the natural thing to
> do, and superficially seems fair.
>
> However, when do you add more names to the list? When has someone
> contributed enough to warrant that? Is it fair that the original authors
> keep getting the credit for the contributions of others? After a while,
> perhaps there is next to nothing left of the original contributions, but
> the bar is really high for removing anyone from the authors. Listing the
> authors gives the impression this is *their* file, while everyone should
> feel welcome to contribute, and everyone who contributes should feel
> ownership.
>
> IMHO we would be better off using just the git history for the credits.
>
:) - I totally agree with your stand; this patch was an (almost)
direct conversion from the earlier format, hence this patch.

But yes, I will remove it in the next iteration.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
BR,
Sumit.

> PS. I am no saint here, I've got a couple of authors lines myself. I
> promise not to add more. I certainly won't chastise anyone for adding
> theirs.
>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center



-- 
Thanks and regards,

Sumit Semwal
Linaro Mobile Group - Kernel Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC 3/4] Documentation: move dma-buf documentation to rst Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> - 2016-08-11 12:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC 3/4] Documentation: move dma-buf documentation to rst Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2016-08-11 13:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC 3/4] Documentation: move dma-buf documentation to rst Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> - 2016-08-11 14:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC 3/4] Documentation: move dma-buf documentation to rst Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> - 2016-08-11 14:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC 3/4] Documentation: move dma-buf documentation to rst Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> - 2016-08-11 14:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC 3/4] Documentation: move dma-buf documentation to rst Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> - 2016-08-11 14:50 +0200

csiph-web