Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1460398
| From | Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer |
| Date | 2016-08-11 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s4VSu-2Iy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rZ9EJ-1T0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4UD0-208-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4VfH-2u4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4Vpn-2xP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 06:22:03PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote: > Hi Hanjun, Tomasz, > > On 11 August 2016 at 18:15, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2016/8/11 17:37, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > >> > >> Hi Fu, > >> > >> Do you mind if I send IORT series where new drivers/acpi/arm64 directory > >> would be introduced in first place ? This means your GTDT set would > >> depend on IORT. > > > > > > I think it's reasonable as the IORT for ITS is the key device enablement > > for PCI MSI. I talked to Fuwei offline and he is fine with it. > > That's no problem at all, will do. > > Can I do this: > (1)apply Tomasz's v8 patchset on the master branch of upstream kernel > (2)rebase my v10 on the top of Tomasz's v8 > (3)git format-patch as v11, repost it > > Is that OK for everyone? :-) I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64 directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull request. If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes, you can proceed as above. Lorenzo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer fu.wei@linaro.org - 2016-07-26 14:30 +0200
[PATCH v10 5/8] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Simplify ACPI support code. fu.wei@linaro.org - 2016-07-26 14:30 +0200
[PATCH v10 4/8] acpi/arm64: Add GTDT table parse driver fu.wei@linaro.org - 2016-07-26 14:30 +0200
[PATCH v10 2/8] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Add a new enum for spi type fu.wei@linaro.org - 2016-07-26 14:30 +0200
[PATCH v10 3/8] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Improve printk relevant code fu.wei@linaro.org - 2016-07-26 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> - 2016-08-11 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-08-11 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> - 2016-08-11 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-08-11 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-17 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> - 2016-08-18 09:50 +0200
csiph-web