Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1457635
| From | Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm: Add API for capturing frame CRCs |
| Date | 2016-08-08 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s3OSZ-7Ux-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rXJsZ-6VO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXJt0-6VO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <s3gRp-2h2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 6 August 2016 at 19:04, Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > On 22 July 2016 at 15:10, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote: >> +/** >> + * DOC: CRC ABI >> + * >> + * DRM device drivers can provide to userspace CRC information of each frame as >> + * it reached a given hardware component (a "source"). >> + * >> + * Userspace can control generation of CRCs in a given CRTC by writing to the > > s/can/must/ > > Is it worth having 'auto' as a default source perhaps? Yup, it's the case in v4, so you just cat the data file and start getting CRCs. >> + * file dri/0/crtc-N/crc/control in debugfs, with N being the index of the CRTC. >> + * Accepted values are source names (which are driver-specific) and the "none" >> + * and "auto" keywords. "none" will disable CRC generation and "auto" will let >> + * the driver select a default source of frame CRCs for this CRTC. > > Is it also worth having 'connector-%s' (named as per sysfs, e.g. > connector-HDMI-A-0) as a standardised entry, for cloneable CRTCs which > have CRC control on the connector rather than the CRTC? My impression right now is that only "auto" makes sense as a standardised entry, as any explicit sources are pretty much hw-dependent so the tests will need knowledge about the hw anyway. The IGT tests already try each connector in each CRTC when looking for a setup that supports CRC capture (with the auto source). Regards, Tomeu
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm: Add API for capturing frame CRCs Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> - 2016-08-06 23:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm: Add API for capturing frame CRCs Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> - 2016-08-08 11:20 +0200
csiph-web