Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1457034
| From | Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Add proxy function for the mmap file operation |
| Date | 2016-08-05 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s2Lku-6NT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s0h7b-5Pd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s0jVn-7KZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s1MLF-8fV-77@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2Koq-69A-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:31:36PM +0200, Nicolai Stange wrote: >>Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> writes: >>> However, if you wish to have some mmapable debugfs file which *can* go >>> away, introducing mmap support in the debugfs full proxy is perfectly >>> valid. But please see below. >> >>Assuming that you've got such a use case, please consider resending your >>patch along with the Cocci script below (and the Coccinelle team CC'ed, >>of course). If OTOH your mmapable debugfs files are never removed, just >>drop this message and use debugfs_create_file_unsafe() instead. > > So we do have an implementation using this, but it's likely we will > keep it out-of-tree (it's a stop-gap until we can get a non-debugfs > implementation of the functionality into mainline). > > Do you think it's worth merging this (and your cocci script) anyway to > save someone else doing the same thing later? I personally think that having ->mmap() support in debugfs would be a good thing to have in general and I expect there to be some further demand in the future. But I also think that it is a little bit fragile in the current state: how many people actually run the Cocci scripts on their changes? AFAICT, even the kbuild test robot doesn't do this. And after all, the Cocci script I provided could very well miss some obfuscated writes to vma->vm_ops: if they aren't done from ->mmap() themselves, but from some helper function invoked therein, for example. I would personally prefer a hand coded full_proxy_mmap() which WARN()s if the proxied ->mmap() changes vma->vm_ops: - this would add an extra safety net - ->mmap() for debugfs files isn't performance critical - and lastly, we're already doing something similar to this in open_proxy_open(). But in the end, it's not mine but Greg K-H's opinion that matters here... Thanks, Nicolai
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] debugfs: Add proxy function for the mmap file operation Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> - 2016-07-29 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Add proxy function for the mmap file operation Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Add proxy function for the mmap file operation Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Add proxy function for the mmap file operation Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com> - 2016-08-05 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Add proxy function for the mmap file operation Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 13:20 +0200
csiph-web