Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1455738

Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in times()/clock_gettime()

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in times()/clock_gettime()
Date 2016-08-03 12:50 +0200
Message-ID <s21Ul-1q9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rZbdv-2V0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s1Fhc-3ao-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <s1Q2R-280-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:04:52AM +0200, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote:

> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED)
> > 
> > This here wants a comment on why we're doing this. Because I'm sure
> > that if someone were to read this code in a few weeks they'd go
> > WTF!?
> 
> I had that config variable set in the machine I was testing on, and
> thought that for some reason it was related to my observations. I will
> repeat the experiment without it, and if I obtain the same results I
> will drop the conditional. Otherwise I will motivate its necessity.
> 

No, I meant we want a comment here explaining the reason for these
prefetches.

You'll need the #ifdef because se->cfs_rq doesn't exist otherwise.

> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2998,6 +2998,11 @@ unsigned long long task_sched_runtime(struct
> task_struct *p)
>          * thread, breaking clock_gettime().
>          */
>         if (task_current(rq, p) && task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED)
> +               struct sched_entity *curr = (&p->se)->cfs_rq->curr;
> +               prefetch(curr);
> +               prefetch(&curr->exec_start);
> +#endif
>                 update_rq_clock(rq);
>                 p->sched_class->update_curr(rq);
>         }
> -- -- >8 -- -- >8 -- -- >8 -- -- >8 -- -- >8 -- -- >8 -- -- >8 
> 
> I post below the snippets of generated code with and without CSE that
> I got running 'disassemble /m task_sched_runtime' in gdb; you'll see
> they're identical. If you prefer the explicit hint I'll include it in
> v2, but it's probably safe to say it isn't needed.

I much prefer the manual CSE, its much more readable.

Also, maybe pull the whole thing into a helper function with a
descriptive name, like:

/*
 * XXX comment on why this is needed goes here...
 */
static inline void prefetch_curr_exec_start(struct task_struct *p)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
	struct sched_entity *curr = (&p->se)->cfs_rq->curr;

	prefetch(curr);
	prefetch(&curr->exec_start);
#endif
}

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in times()/clock_gettime() Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz> - 2016-07-26 16:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in  times()/clock_gettime() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-08-02 12:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in  times()/clock_gettime() Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de> - 2016-08-02 15:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in  times()/clock_gettime() Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz> - 2016-08-03 00:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in  times()/clock_gettime() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-08-03 12:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in  times()/clock_gettime() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-08-03 13:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in  times()/clock_gettime() Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz> - 2016-08-05 10:00 +0200

csiph-web