Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1453211
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region |
| Date | 2016-08-01 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1lBL-6Wv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s1i1c-4yM-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <s1iaS-4Cd-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <s1jgB-5wi-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s1jzX-5Fk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s1lip-6Ns-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:17:09PM +0800, zijun_hu wrote: > On 08/01/2016 07:24 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 06:59:50PM +0800, zijun_hu wrote: > >> 2,it is more portable; we only need to call fdt_check_header() and don't > >> care about fdt header filed layout; moreover,fdt module is another independent > >> module and arm64 only uses it and should not depend on more details of fdt > >> such as size and magic fields locate within the first MIN_FDT_ALIGN bytes; > >> the decision whether a fdt header is corrupted should be left to fdt team > > > > While it's true that we assume knowledge of the FDT format, and ideally > > we'd leave this to common code, we do so regardless by requiring the > > header size. So both approaches assume details regarding the FDT format. > > > okay, the only thing my solution is depends on is the fdt header struct name > which maybe remain unchanged in further fdt source modification > regardless of fields layout or position or header size; > > by the way, my solution only maps more one SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE at extreme condition > (offset + sizeof(struct fdt_header)) > SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE, it can occurs very rarely, > even it happens, it is no matter due to the fast mapping operations > > That all said, ard.biesheuvel's can resolves address fault too, you can decide which > solution to used, maybe ask fdt team for some advisements As a member of the "fdt team" (at least for bindings and the spec), I'm happy with Ard's patch. ;) Regardless, many thanks for the report, and the proposed fix! Thanks, Mark.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> - 2016-08-01 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-08-01 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> - 2016-08-01 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-01 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> - 2016-08-01 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-01 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-01 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-08-01 14:30 +0200
csiph-web