Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1455374

[PATCH 0048/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

From Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH 0048/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date 2016-08-02 20:40 +0200
Message-ID <s1MLF-8fV-73@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/power.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c
index fcd4ce6..7a6cd36 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/power.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ static ssize_t acpi_power_in_use_show(struct device *dev,
 	resource = to_power_resource(to_acpi_device(dev));
 	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", !!resource->ref_count);
 }
-static DEVICE_ATTR(resource_in_use, 0444, acpi_power_in_use_show, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(resource_in_use, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, acpi_power_in_use_show, NULL);
 
 static void acpi_power_sysfs_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
-- 
2.9.2

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0048/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 20:40 +0200

csiph-web