Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1454117
| From | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 0931/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Date | 2016-08-02 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1H9g-4r7-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-ptl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-ptl.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-ptl.c index 3947e8b..c5029d1 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-ptl.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-ptl.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ /* NB: add /proc interfaces in upcoming patches */ int portal_rotor = LNET_PTL_ROTOR_HASH_RT; -module_param(portal_rotor, int, 0644); +module_param(portal_rotor, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(portal_rotor, "redirect PUTs to different cpu-partitions"); static int -- 2.9.2
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0931/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:40 +0200
csiph-web