Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1453945
| From | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 0177/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Date | 2016-08-02 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1Gwy-3Wp-51@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-cs5535.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-cs5535.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-cs5535.c index 90278b1..b17c3f9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-cs5535.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-cs5535.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ #define GPIO_DEFAULT_MASK 0x0F7FFFFF static ulong mask = GPIO_DEFAULT_MASK; -module_param_named(mask, mask, ulong, 0444); +module_param_named(mask, mask, ulong, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mask, "GPIO channel mask."); /* -- 2.9.2
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0177/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:00 +0200
csiph-web