[PATCH 0142/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	[PATCH 0142/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date	Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:40:04 +0200
Message-ID	<s1Gde-3Oh-91@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Original-To	mchehab@kernel.org, maurochehab@gmail.com, mchehab@infradead.org, mchehab@redhat.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, dougthompson@xmission.com, bp@alien8.de
X-Extloop1	1
X-Ironport-Av	E=Sophos;i="5.28,459,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1033566238"
X-Mailer	git-send-email 2.9.2
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID	<linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	39
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org
X-Original-Date	Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:44:05 +0800
X-Original-Message-ID	<20160802104405.23214-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
X-Original-Sender	linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref	csiph.com linux.kernel:1453867

Show key headers only | View raw

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
index 10c305b..1603b76 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
@@ -74,16 +74,16 @@ static int edac_set_poll_msec(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)
 }
 
 /* Parameter declarations for above */
-module_param(edac_mc_panic_on_ue, int, 0644);
+module_param(edac_mc_panic_on_ue, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(edac_mc_panic_on_ue, "Panic on uncorrected error: 0=off 1=on");
-module_param(edac_mc_log_ue, int, 0644);
+module_param(edac_mc_log_ue, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(edac_mc_log_ue,
 		 "Log uncorrectable error to console: 0=off 1=on");
-module_param(edac_mc_log_ce, int, 0644);
+module_param(edac_mc_log_ce, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(edac_mc_log_ce,
 		 "Log correctable error to console: 0=off 1=on");
 module_param_call(edac_mc_poll_msec, edac_set_poll_msec, param_get_int,
-		  &edac_mc_poll_msec, 0644);
+		  &edac_mc_poll_msec, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(edac_mc_poll_msec, "Polling period in milliseconds");
 
 static struct device *mci_pdev;
-- 
2.9.2

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0142/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 13:40 +0200

csiph-web