Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1452613
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] fs: wipe off the compiler warn |
| Date | 2016-07-30 01:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s0p4J-2QF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s0hgS-5SV-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:46:39 +0800 zhongjiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> wrote: > From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> > > when compile the kenrel code, I happens to the following warn. > fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c:1156:2: warning: ___new_insert_key___ may be used > uninitialized in this function. > memcpy(new_insert_key_addr, &new_insert_key, KEY_SIZE); > ^ > The patch just fix it to avoid the warn. > > Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> > --- > fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c b/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c > index b751eea..512ce95 100644 > --- a/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c > +++ b/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c > @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ int balance_internal(struct tree_balance *tb, > int order; > int insert_num, n, k; > struct buffer_head *S_new; > - struct item_head new_insert_key; > + struct item_head uninitialized_var(new_insert_key); > struct buffer_head *new_insert_ptr = NULL; > struct item_head *new_insert_key_addr = insert_key; How do we know this isn't a real bug? It isn't obvious to me that this warning is a false positive.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] fs: wipe off the compiler warn zhongjiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> - 2016-07-29 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] fs: wipe off the compiler warn Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-07-30 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] fs: wipe off the compiler warn zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> - 2016-07-30 04:40 +0200
csiph-web