Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1401448
| From | Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests |
| Date | 2016-05-16 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rzoSJ-6j7-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <rspTz-3Q0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsu6S-7lj-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsxR7-1XC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsy0O-22y-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsykb-2uQ-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 09:40 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 27/04/16 14:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > int xen_nr_legacy_irqs()
> > > {
> > > if (xen_hvm_domain())
> > > return nr_legacy_irqs();
> > > if (xen_initial_domain())
> > > return NR_IRQS_LEGACY;
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > Yeah, if that does the right thing...
>
> I think it will break xen_allocate_irq_gsi() again, unless we check for HVM
> domain explicitly. Which would be ugly.
I guess we all forgot about this patch, in the meantime the merge window
has opened.
Should we go ahead with:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146115812124261&w=2
?
It might not be complete, but it is certainly an improvement.
Otherwise, please submit proper patches ASAP. I don't think we want to
delay this fix until 4.8.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-05-16 13:30 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-05-16 16:00 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-05-16 17:30 +0200
csiph-web